disciplesX.com life + culture + faith + art + blog posts

30Aug/071

just what is emerging?

I wanted to share a couple of interesting quotes and thoughts today, little things that have been swirling around in my head and heart.

Jesus tells us about the parable of the mustard seed. (Matthew 13:31-35) It's one of those simple but deceptive verses of the Gospel of Matthew which challenge believers to consider the nature and purpose of the kingdom of God. For example, read what Shane Claiborne had to say about this parable in the Irresistible Revolution.

Matthew strategically places the mustard seed parable in the middle of a story about gardening in which Jesus commands people not to tear up the weeds from the garden but to let the wheat and weeds grow together (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43). Then he tells his listeners that the kingdom of God is like mustard, which grows like a wild bush (Matt. 13:31-35). I once heard a farmer say it is like kudzu (a wild vine that grows everywhere), and a city preacher compared it to the wild weeds that grow out of the abandoned houses and crack the sidewalks. The mustard seed's growth would have been familiar to first-century Jews and its symbolic meaning unmistakably clear. It may have even been growing in the wild around them as Jesus spoke.

Jews valued order and had very strict rules about how to keep a tidy garden, and one of the secrets was to keep out mustard. It was notorious for invading the well-trimmed veggies and other plants and for quickly taking over the entire garden. (Kind of like yeast works its way through dough... hmm.) Then they'd be left with only mustard! Jewish law even forbade planting mustard in the garden. When those first-century peasants heard Jesus' images, they would have giggled, or maybe they would have told him to hush before he got killed. Here he is using this infamous plant to describe God's kingdom subtly taking over the world.

This is a bottom up revolution, an "annoying" revolution. It's a kingdom that spreads with determination and perseverance. It adapts to its surroundings - it changes as the landscape and climate changes.

Perhaps this most readily fits with the Christian faith as Daniel Migliore states in his book, Faith Seeking Understanding: "The changing, ambiguous, and often precarious world poses ever new questions for faith, and many answers that sufficed yesterday are no longer compelling today." Migliore writes: "Authentic faith is no sedative for world-weary souls, no satchel full of ready answers to the deepest questions of life. Instead, faith in God revealed in Jesus Christ sets an inquiry in motion, fights the inclination to accept things as they are, and continually calls in question unexamined assumptions about God, our world, and ourselves."

In both of these quotes, the images given of the kingdom of God and a faithful life suggest a "bubbling up", a movement that adapts to its surroundings, seeking and growing in new ways in a changing, difficult world. It is a slow revolution - a revolution of little things, of persistence and small questions leading to a deeper understanding of the joy of following Christ. But it is also annoying, ever pushing and challenging our boundaries.

In a sense, this is some element of the life of a follower of Christ and a community of Christians that I hope continues to emerge. I suppose my next question is - what would a church look like if it was ever seeking, ever allowing the questions of God and life to bubble up? What would it look like to be a follower that seeks to be a part of that irresistible revolution that sneaks its way into you bit by bit? What would it do to our world if Christians again focused on doing the little things that changed lives and share the love of God?

  • Share/Bookmark
22Aug/070

Successful or Faithful?

Mother Theresa once said, "We are not called to be successful - we are called to be faithful."

I really think these are the two ends of the spectrum that a lot of Christians get wrong.

Let's begin with "success". We have very possibly seen the peak of megachurches, who work hard to make the Gospel accessible to a materialistic culture. Megachurches often design worship to be like going to the movies on a Friday night, except with free childcare, free tickets, and free parking. They might remove controversial religious symbols from the walls and make the service as slick as a late night talk show. Denominationalism is left at the door, and gift-centered ministry takes center-stage, an approach that emphasizes the gifts and interests everyone has to build community and share the good news. Ultimately, it does make going to church easy. You don't have to think too hard, and there is really something for everyone.

I don't think megachurches are all that bad. Certainly, there is a challenge for Christians and the church to make sure their faith is accessible and visible. We need to be aware of the barriers that can keep someone on the outside - and we need to address the issues that are making people uncomfortable. But does that mean make church like McDonalds though? Does that mean watering down the Gospel up front, so you can give the "hard sell" later on? Does that mean not asking difficult questions? Does that mean worshipping the god of success, over the God of faithfulness?

And the other side of the debate - the "faithful old churches". These are your denomination based congregations with strong history, order, witness, legacy, and so on. There are bylaws and constitutions. There are committees and leadership roles. Here, subtle improvements to worship services and new auxiliary activities like bible studies are the programs of change. There is a tremendous amount of shared power at stake, and the congregations themselves work through a variety of methods to come to a resolution about some pressing issue. Some congregations are dying, having dwindled membership from their heydays of the 1950-60s. They did not change or respond well enough to the shifting of their neighborhood. Others are struggling to be revitalized, but it seems like a mysterious process that may or may not ever work. Some are doing okay, but their future has still a fog of uncertainty.

These churches might describe themselves as being "faithful" - steady rocks in the sea of change that is American culture. But does faithfulness mean unchanging? Does faithfulness mean not willing to do a new thing? Does faithfulness mean not willing to get up, move far away from home, and start over? I would argue that many of our "old yeller" churches have distorted their view of faithfulness and have missed out on numerous opportunities to drop everything and follow Jesus.

There is a middle way - a way that relies upon God for whatever success that may come, but a way that ultimately is faithful unto the One who calls us. Following Christ is about faithfulness - but it is about being willing to take the risks, to leave everything behind. Our worry should not be whether or not it is successful - our focus should be on serving and loving God's children. In the end, whether or not we reach hundreds or thousands or millions, whether or not our church grows or expands its ministry, the question will be of our faithfulness - what did we do with what God had given us?

  • Share/Bookmark